Réponse :
voila se que je te propose n'ésite pas a mettre un coeur.
je c pas c'est un devoir de quelle niveau mais je les fait de mon niveau 3°
Explications :
There is no question of denying the power of the industry [1] which binds the individual to himself, nor even of denying the natural preponderance, fixed in our flesh, of individual instinct over instinct sympathetic or generous. But there is no question either of maintaining that society, being made up of individuals, has in reality only the name which designates it, and that the public good is never anything but private happiness. understood. To hold the two ends of the chain at the same time, we must consider the real development of man, through the breadth of view that this development itself makes possible. So we will see that if man was not first able (…) to understand what he owes his contemporaries and his predecessors, the development of his intelligence now allows him to grasp, like a glaring truth , that the human individual does not exist. Because, the individual, exemplary of our biological species, is not, as such, a man, but an animal. What makes the individual man is not the individual himself, reduced to himself, but language, thought, knowledge and know-how, all things that come not from himself , but of the society of his contemporaries and his predecessors. To say that there is only humanity, understood as past, present and future society, and that the idea of the individual is only an abstraction of our intelligence, is to proclaim such an obvious truth, we can be surprised that it can pass for a paradox.
